Happy World AIDS Day!
24.9% of Lesotho’s
population currently is infected with HIV. Think about that for a moment.
It is absolutely mind
blowing to look around yourself at a meeting, party, football match, or funeral
and think that statistically one-quarter of the people you are looking at have
HIV.
Somehow, as I consider this, it does not shock me then that
in one of my four years in Lesotho I had
a possible HIV exposure.
Within minutes of my potential exposure to HIV, I was
desperately trying to control the runaway adrenaline in my body as it caused my
legs to twitch while rationally reminding myself through Google and memories
from Peace Corps trainings that I still had ways to protect myself from the
virus.
As I researched PEP-Post Exposure Prophylaxis, I struggled
to contain my panic. Everything I read warned that PEP is difficult and has
many side effects. There were many reports noting permanent liver or kidney
damage. There were even more highlighting that patients were unable to complete
PEP due to side effects and therefore would still end up HIV positive. Reading
these reports, I was terrified and furious
at the series of events that put me in this position.
PEP is actually one of two options available to prevent HIV
infection. PEP typically consists of taking Antiretroviral (ART) medications
for 28-30 days, depending on the type of medications taken, after a single incident of possible exposure. The simplest explanation of how it works is
that the ART medications prevent HIV replication in the body until all cells
that may have been exposed die off.
The alternate option is for people at consistently high-risk exposure to HIV.
This is called PrEP or Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and consists of ART taken
throughout the period of high-risk (e.g. having a long-term sexual partner who
is HIV-positive). Scientifically, it works the same way that PEP does, however,
the person must continue to take it correctly until a month after exposure risk
ends.
Within nine hours, I was with the Peace Corps Medical
Officer discussing PEP. We did baseline blood work
centered around my liver functionality and current HIV status, which I already knew to be negative as I test regularly. Peace Corps Lesotho
uses two medications for PEP, both prescribed for thirty days.
Our Peace Corps Doctor’s no-nonsense approach to the
situation and reassurance really calmed me down. She assured me that the
medication is effective and that the side effects would not be too bothersome. Because
Peace Corps Lesotho prescribes a combination of medication not used for HIV
treatment in Lesotho, the likelihood of me having had contact with a strain of HIV resistant to the medication was virtually non-existent. I reminded
myself of this rational explanation many times in the ensuing three and half
months. As I left the medical office, I mentally committed
to being the best PEP patient possible. I set alarms on my Fitbit to ensure I
took my medication on time, every time. I
cancelled all plans to drink over the thirty days to increase the efficacy of
my medication and to decrease the risk of liver complications. This was atypically difficult as I had plans with fellow Peace Corps Volunteers and colleagues
alike. Cancelling them meant admitting I was on medication, which I managed to
do without letting people know what the medication was for.
Seventeen hours after my possible exposure, I began my
post-exposure prophylactic ART regimen: Isentress and Truvada at 7pm with
dinner and Isentress again at 7am with breakfast.
Over the next few days, I vacillated wildly between
completely at ease with my newfound uncertainty and being a hypochondriac on
the lookout for the terrible side effects the internet warned about. I attended a workshop at a higher elevation
than my usual activities. As my ankles and feet swelled, I convinced myself I
was suffering from kidney failure and would need to switch medications, possibly
decreasing the effectiveness of PEP. Every
time I thought something wrong with me was a dangerous side effect, I returned
to the internet and scared myself some more.
On Day 21, I reached into my pocket to take my morning dose
of Issentress and it was gone! I checked everywhere around me and the path I
had taken, but it had disappeared. I returned to my room (I was at another
workshop, this being the story of my professional life this year) and took a
pill. I then spoke with both of Peace Corps’ doctors in person, over the phone,
and via email, convinced that having one less pill at the end of the month
would put me at greater risk of becoming HIV positive. They were prepared to
open a new package of medication just to replace my pill, however, it turns out
that the 30-day cycle is overly protective, and 28 days is the time needed for
effective PEP. As a result, my 29.5-day course of medication would be
sufficient. My focus at the workshop that day, however, was challenging while I
awaited this information.
After I finished my medication regimen without real side effects,
the waiting period began. HIV has a window period of up to three months before
it will appear in a test. During this time, if present, the virus is replicating nonstop
and literally taking over the body. The immune system cannot detect that the
virus is present and therefore neither can HIV tests.
Despite knowing this, I was eager to test as often as I could. I was
tested six weeks after my potential exposure through both a rapid test and a lab
test. Both came back negative.
During the next two months, I was busier than usual, sleep-deprived,
and traveling constantly. As a result, I had a long-lasting mild cold. I tried
not to let myself dwell on this as a symptom of decreased immune function as I
waited for my next opportunity to test. Every
time I saw my own blood, I couldn’t help but wonder if it was dangerous to
others.
Finally, three and a half months after my possible exposure,
it was time to test again.
My doctor decided to skip the rapid test and only do a laboratory
test. Although this meant I had to wait another day for the results, it also
was more likely to be accurate. It also made receiving my results via email the
next morning thrilling as
My emailed test results. The Peace Corps Medical Officer was as excited about my results as I was! |
Whew! What a relief!
From the time of my potential exposure, I could not help but
think about how I might react if I had contracted HIV.
Prior to receiving my results, I rationalized myself to a
place of acceptance. I had taken ART successfully for a month. If I was HIV
positive, it would mean taking different medications as it would demonstrate
that the HIV was resistant to Isentress and Truvada. At the same time, other
than committing to taking medication daily for the remainder of my life, it
would not need to lead to other major life changes.
Fellow PCV Danielle and I show off our HIV Rapid Test results at Camp BRO. |
I believe that if I were HIV positive, I would feel
confident sharing that status here in Lesotho. Stigma is still a problem here.
It is a barrier to testing and to treatment. At the same time, everyone in this
country has been affected by HIV. Despite stigma and discrimination being
present, it is different that the stigma faced by those with HIV in the United
States.
Before my time in Lesotho, I was ignorant of the dramatic
improvements in HIV treatment and prevention. Thanks to ART, it is possible for
people to be HIV positive and live long, healthy, productive lives. HIV
positive women can give birth to babies who are HIV negative. Couples in which
one partner is negative can conceive a child without the HIV-negative partner contracting
HIV.
So, I believe that even if the ending were different, I
would be sharing this story and this experience. Although doing so with Americans would be a
scary undertaking because popular culture and many politicians would have us
believe that if someone contracts HIV, it is probably because they were
engaging in “sins” such as unprotected sex or recreational drug use. We will
politely ignore that one in
five women in America experiences non-consensual sex during their lifetime.
This restricted view on HIV impacts access to health
services for HIV. People with decent health insurance can typically add HIV
testing to blood work being done. People without such coverage, however, can
only access affordable testing services in limited locales and often testing services
are at cost if available. In 2015, a small town in Indiana found themselves at epidemic
transmission levels for HIV thanks to lack of access to testing services
and opiate addictions among young people. Even in places with access to testing, many Americans do not bother to test for HIV. A recent report from the CDC noted that most Americans with HIV have the virus for an average of three years before learning their status.
Treatment affordability is another issue. ART—Antiretroviral
Therapy—is daily medication that suppresses HIV in the body. It not only has
the ability to give an HIV-positive person better quality of life and a normal
lifespan, but also to suppress the virus to the point that they no longer
transmit the virus. The catch is that the HIV-positive person must adhere
faithfully to their medication to ensure that the virus does not become
resistant to the drug(s). These medications, unfortunately, are not inexpensive
and affording
treatment-especially for the underinsured and uninsured-is not possible on
middle or low incomes. Not surprisingly, once present, HIV is a
pre-existing condition, so without government protections, HIV-positive
people really cannot afford insurance.
The theme of 2018 World AIDS Day is “My Health, My Right.”
With that in mind, I want to challenge readers to recognize
their right and the rights of their countrymen to HIV prevention education and
skills training, their right to confidential HIV testing services, and their
right to treatment for HIV and HIV-related illnesses. It is deplorable that so
many in the United States do not have access to these things and that even more
take their right to health access for granted simply because the HIV prevalence
rate is low.
Also, consider taking twenty minutes to enjoy this Moth podcast featuring a story of an American woman with HIV and a story from a Mosotho man taking an HIV test. It's worth the time!
1 comment:
The Prevention Resource Network provides high impact prevention services to assist HIV negative and HIV positive persons who are at high risk for HIV transmission or acquisition to reduce risk behaviors & address the psychological & medical needs of these individuals to improve overall health outcomes.
Post a Comment